Now He Claims that People are Eating Dogs, Something Is Wrong With Him
The guy tried to suspend the Constitution and overthrow the government, we can't pretend he didn't
Hello friends,
Last night I had my children stay up and watch the debate. My eldest daughter is 14. She listened to the convicted felon babble about eating dogs. She listened to him indulge in deplorable hate rhetoric against immigrants that nobody in our media ever pushes back on.
I could see that she was disgusted by the whole proceeding. Part of me wanted to delight in the way Kamala Harris was making him look like a babbling, incoherent fool, but mostly I was just angry that the sorry excuse for a human being was allowed on that stage.
At some point, all of us need to watch our kids as the silver spoon dictator speaks. We should all feel the shame of recognizing that we've already completely failed the next generation. Part of me was inclined to tell them that other debates have been between two decent human being, but we can’t live in the past.
TFG should not be allowed on the stage. He's called to suspend the Constitution. He tried to get his vice president murdered. He's a convicted felon. He's a rapist. Yet the media still acts like he's a legitimate candidate. If TFG gets elected, he's just going to pull down America's pants, push the country down on the resolute desk, and let Putin have his way.
This whole farce of an election is an embarrassment.
I was very pleased that Kamala came out swinging. After the first debate, I wrote an article about how to beat “the don” in a debate. In that article, I suggested it's simple. Just keep saying “He's weak, he's a loser, he's a coward, he's a liar.”
Kamala called don-boy weak and a liar multiple times. Every time she did so, his mouth puckered up like a sphincter. In fact, as the debate continued, donnie small hands seemed to visibly deflate. He tried to maintain his leering mug shot castrated dictator energy for the whole event, and that was a mistake. I think he's too old to scowl continuously for 2 hours. He should have tried smiling once or twice, even if there's never a chance of him beating Kamala in a beauty contest (no matter what he might think).
I liked how she said that dictators will eat him for lunch and that the world laughs at him. She called him a disgrace. All that was great. I just wish she'd done it even more.
Remember, that guy called to suspend the Constitution. He tried to overthrow our government. I just still find it disgusting and embarrassing that he's on the stage, and that the media doesn't refer to that every time they say his name.
“Vice President Harris versus the evil wannabe tyrant that tried to deprive us of all our freedoms.”
That would be a FAIR way of talking about him.
“Versus the guy who took a shit at Arlington.”
“Versus the guy whose incompetence allowed a pandemic to ravage our nation.”
“Versus the orange asshat blabbermouth who speaks with a forked tongue.”
My fear is that the Democrats are using a strategy that's based on an idealized version of our society rather than the society we have. The simple fact is that the system currently in place to run our elections is DESIGNED to unfairly tip the scales in favor of white supremacists.
It always has been!
This is why it's a problem when people refuse to admit that the USA is a racist country even though everyone knows damn well that it's a racist. They either are oppressed by American racism, or they benefit from it, but everybody KNOWS.
Normally what happens is that the liberal elites act like it's fine because they know that, for the most part, they will be shielded when the white supremacists start hurting people. They can afford to pretend it's not happening because they have big bank accounts and they live in gated communities.
But not this time.
If Putin's puppet gets sworn in again, I expect he'll send the military to round up all the elites he dislikes first. I don't know why we call these people “elites” since apparently none of them have ever read a history book. We're staring down the barrel of annihilation. Now's not the time to be passive.
Any rational person who watched that debate had to come away with the impression that one choice represents a reasonable hope for the future (KAMALA OF COURSE, FOR THE LOVE OF GOD KAMALA), and one person is a deranged psychopath who spent half the time indulging in hate rhetoric designed to incite violence against innocent people (NOBODY IS EATING DOGS).
The problem is, I can tell by the yard signs in my neighborhood that America is full of irrational people. Also, it disturbs me that I've already seen a few articles that tried to claim “neither” side discussed policy.
Excuse me?
Kamala clearly laid out the various plans she has for creating a fair economy that gives working class people a chance. She discussed tax breaks for the middle class. She discussed realistic solutions for world problems.
The other guy said a bunch of lies about eating dogs and murdering babies.
Any article that tries to claim “both sides” were “weak” on policy is nothing more than propaganda.
I swear, it's as if all the high-priced jerks who work in the media don't know how America works and they refuse to learn. At this point I think it's deliberate sabotage and not stupidity.
They’re working to destroy any chance working class people have to get ahead, and they gave the dementia dictator plenty of assists.
For example, every single time he told one of his BIG LIES they let him babble on for another minute or so before correcting him. You guys are in the MEDIA. You should know that you need to make a correction IMMEDIATELY.
By the time the moderators got around to contesting the absurdity, the audience was no longer listening. They were too busy flexing and carrying on as if they'd just made a full court shot and captured it on video. This all plays into the unquestionable patriarch vibe the jerk is going for. Those count as “wins” for him.
When the guy lies, you cut the mic! You have to make him look weak. You have to stand up to him when he lies!
Also, why the hell did they let Florida con have the last word on every point? Why did they let him muscle in again and again and NEVER extend the same courtesy to Kamala? That was blatantly unfair.
The thing is, to some people, that simple act of barging in at the end and rolling over the moderators is why the vast, ignorant percentage of our population will try to claim that oathbreaker emerged victorious.
The media needs to quit pretending that this is a serious proceeding. It's a show. It's theater. People don't tune in to listen to a bunch of boring talk about taxes. A distressingly large percentage of the population is STUPID! You know that for a fact because a lot of them voted for a guy born with a silver spoon in his mouth who has never worked a day in his life and has never achieved anything!
I would have liked Kamala to hit him a little harder to emphasize how little he accomplished during his time as president. Captain Shartface certainly repeatedly, and unfairly, tried to blame Kamala for her time in office. Why not mention that he did absolutely nothing? The only piece of legislation he passed was a tax break for the rich. He stands there making empty promise after empty promise. He's been doing it for 10 years. He never achieves ANYTHING.
Kamala won that debate, and I recognize there's a strong chance I'm underestimating the resiliency of the American people. I also thought that Biden should have spoken more strongly during his debate in 2020. But Biden turned to the cameras and addressed the middle class, and that proved to be effective.
Kamala did the same thing, but she adjusted the strategy and added in a few more attacks. She was poised and intelligent, and she took the air out of her opponent who looked pitiful and angry and spiteful and pathetic. He said not one thing of substance. He just spat and spewed and turned his face into a sphincter. He was an embarrassment, like he always is.
The problem is that the media is now going to show clips that depict him favorably. They’re going to repeat his lies over and over.
This debate should be a barometer for what you read going forward. Any headline that suggests the performance of the republican candidate was in any way acceptable indicates that you've stumbled upon a pro white supremacy publication. She was brilliant. He was awful. But that's been the race since the beginning.
We know that Kamala is going to win the popular vote. I have zero doubt about that. The only question is whether her popularity will be enough to overcome the corrupt mechanism of white supremacy that's been enabling the dregs of humanity to wield power since the founding of our nation.
We can't sit here and ignore the fact that our system is corrupt. We have to embrace a strategy that confronts that corruption, rather than one that denies it exists. The media is complicit, and something has to be done about that as well (break up the conglomerates).
Be mindful of the context of what we’re dealing with!
I suspect that there are blackmail recordings from Epstein’s pedophile island that depict that guy doing despicable things. If those recordings ever emerge into the public, they need to be shown on television. People shouldn’t be allowed to cast a vote without knowing the truth. We all know how awful he is in public, can you imagine what he must do when he suspects nobody is watching? But I know that the media will protect him under the guise of saying such content is not “appropriate” for television.
The only thing I see that’s inappropriate is the suggestion that our nation should make a monster into the most powerful person in the world.
Kamala humiliated her opponent. But the United States of America was humiliated by the fact that the most corrupt human being to ever hold the office of president was allowed on the stage in the first place.
My CoSchedule referral link
Here’s my referral link to my preferred headline analyzer tool. If you sign up through this, it’s another way to support this newsletter (thank you).
Normally your use of the word "he" in a title like this would occasion me to ask what man you are talking about, but in this case that is not necessary.
I'm a Canadian, and I consider this affair none of my business because I obviously cannot vote in this election. All I can hope for is that the correct choice is ultimately made, and that the government will pass laws after this preventing mentally incompetent people from running for office and voting.
You're right, his mouth does look like a sphincter when he talks 😆💙🌊🇺🇸