I loved Dahl as a child and I found him mean. The horrible children and adults were judged on their looks rather than their behaviour. So quite like real life at the time. I never read Danny, but you’ve piqued my interest. The casual stigma aimed at the poor just for being poor revolts me.
I've always felt that Dahl presented the poor as noble and the rich as cruel oppressors. Yes, there are certainly things about his books I'd change, but I think he can communicate with children on a level few other writers have ever been able to achieve. Thanks for the thoughtful comment, I'll reflect more on what you said the next time I pick up one of Dahl's books.
I loved Dahl as a child and I found him mean. The horrible children and adults were judged on their looks rather than their behaviour. So quite like real life at the time. I never read Danny, but you’ve piqued my interest. The casual stigma aimed at the poor just for being poor revolts me.
I've always felt that Dahl presented the poor as noble and the rich as cruel oppressors. Yes, there are certainly things about his books I'd change, but I think he can communicate with children on a level few other writers have ever been able to achieve. Thanks for the thoughtful comment, I'll reflect more on what you said the next time I pick up one of Dahl's books.
I agree he punched up well at the thoughtless rich